(v) is actually (*&v) since when? – stackoverflow.com

(v) is actually (*&v) since when? – stackoverflow.com

02:28 No Comments
could C++ standards gurus please enlighten me: since which C++ standard version has this statement failed because "(v)" seems to be equivalent to "(*&v)" ? ie. for example the code : #define ...

from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow
via Blogspot

Share this

Unknown

0 Comment to "(v) is actually (*&v) since when? – stackoverflow.com"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)