Why is this C++ expression involving overloaded operators and implicit conversions ambiguous? – stackoverflow.com 07:43 Posted by Unknown No Comments operator bool breaks the use of operator< in the following example. Can anyone explain why bool is just as relevant in the if (a < 0) expression as the specific operator, an whether there is a ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitCreature that swims in the solid ground – worldbuilding.stackexchange.comC# programming on macOS – apple.stackexchange.comTV series episode where a stand-up comedian is forced to peform in Hell for all eternity? – scifi.stackexchange.comWhat sealing type for cable/tube enter casing for outdoor use? – electronics.stackexchange.comWhy isn't this C program looping from a negative origin? – stackoverflow.comWhy did my potatoes not grow? – gardening.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Why is this C++ expression involving overloaded operators and implicit conversions ambiguous? – stackoverflow.com"
Post a Comment