Should the Great Schism of 1054 be taken to be 1204 (or 1182) instead? – history.stackexchange.com 13:00 Posted by Unknown No Comments It seems that 1054 wasn't such a big deal: forty years later Pope Urban and Emperor Alexios were on such good terms that a crusade was initiated to save Constantinople and the Holy Lands; even in 1136 ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitWhy (historically) include the number of arguments (argc) as a parameter of main? – retrocomputing.stackexchange.comHow can I recognise that I am teasing someone too much without verbal feedback from that person? – interpersonal.stackexchange.comI'm seeing red dots everywhere – meta.stackexchange.comHTML login form without a CSRF protection – security.stackexchange.comCheese suggestions to replace melted Velveeta – cooking.stackexchange.comDefining macro \gsetlength as global setlength, reliable? – tex.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Should the Great Schism of 1054 be taken to be 1204 (or 1182) instead? – history.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment