Why does a calculation to count objects covering a certain area seem to give nonsensical units? – physics.stackexchange.com 05:10 Posted by Unknown No Comments Suppose you want to estimate the number of atoms in a rectangular sheet of graphene. You might estimate the sheet to have $10^{7}$ atoms along one edge and $2*10^{7}$ atoms along the other edge. ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitWhat are sensitive Wordpress site directories – security.stackexchange.comPGFplots gets a dimension too large while reading data – tex.stackexchange.comBreaking the T - An Inversion of the classic Crossing the T – worldbuilding.stackexchange.comSo… is prostitution in Canada legal or not? – law.stackexchange.comHow to translate ‘To be or not to be, that is the question’ – japanese.stackexchange.comCan a website download documents, images, or other information onto my iMac without my consent or awareness? – security.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Why does a calculation to count objects covering a certain area seem to give nonsensical units? – physics.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment