How should I formalize that there’s no canonical isomorphism between a finite Abelian group and its Pontryagin dual? – mathoverflow.net 10:04 Posted by Unknown No Comments The title says it all, but let me repeat. We all learn that the Pontryagin dual of a finite Abelian group is abstractly isomorphic as groups, but there’s no canonical isomorphism. I think I ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitConfusion with regards to the phrase "exactly one of the events occurs" – math.stackexchange.comRebus this, Rebus that – puzzling.stackexchange.comIf I'm writing in US English, am I not allowed to use the metric system? – writing.stackexchange.comCan players declare that they are making a specific ability check? – rpg.stackexchange.comHow avoid a question about women being loyal housewives? – interpersonal.stackexchange.comHow do I deal with people trying to convince me to wear makeup? – interpersonal.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "How should I formalize that there’s no canonical isomorphism between a finite Abelian group and its Pontryagin dual? – mathoverflow.net"
Post a Comment