Why is there no symplectic version of spectral geometry? – mathoverflow.net 09:47 Posted by Unknown No Comments Fist, recall that on a Riemannian manifold $(M,g)$ the Laplace-Beltrami operator $\Delta_g:C^\infty(M)\to C^\infty(M)$ is defined as $$ \Delta_g=\mathrm{div}_g\circ\mathrm{grad}_g, $$ where the ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel Terkaithow to deal with inactive students in undergraduate projects? – academia.stackexchange.comThe proper term for a third party economy – money.stackexchange.comHow to read so many stars and parentheses? – stackoverflow.comMillions of (small) text files in a folder – unix.stackexchange.comWhat anime is this character from? – scifi.stackexchange.comIs there an official way to effectively carry a holy symbol without breaking Vow of Poverty? – rpg.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Why is there no symplectic version of spectral geometry? – mathoverflow.net"
Post a Comment