In a ring, result of multiple (of "addition" operation) is not the same as result of multiplication, correct? – math.stackexchange.com 09:40 Posted by Unknown No Comments In a ring, a multiple for addition is written as $na$ to stand for $(a + a + ... + a)$. This is not necessarily the same as $n * a$ (the "multiplication" operation). Is that correct? Multiple is ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel Terkait80s DRAM chips: one per bit? – retrocomputing.stackexchange.comIs smite considered a spell? – rpg.stackexchange.comTransformation accent characters written in Tex – tex.stackexchange.comWhat tier is Pathfinder Unchained Monk? – rpg.stackexchange.comSlotMachine game as first Android app – codereview.stackexchange.comHow to create a symlink which opens (literally) the target file – unix.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "In a ring, result of multiple (of "addition" operation) is not the same as result of multiplication, correct? – math.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment