Why isn't Anti de Sitter space taken seriously as a model of reality? – physics.stackexchange.com 23:30 Posted by Unknown No Comments I asked a few questions here earlier regarding a physics model which could possibly point to Eternal Return, and was pointed towards Anti De Sitter space. Arguments in theories for Eternal Return ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitFastest way to solve chain-calculations – stackoverflow.comMay I include results from a collaboration in my PhD thesis? – academia.stackexchange.comIs there an explanation for why both "pop" and "pops" are used to mean father (singular)? – english.stackexchange.comConversion of polarized light to unpolarized – physics.stackexchange.comWhere can I find resources for bedtime story plots? – writing.stackexchange.comLevel 0 Characters in 5e – rpg.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Why isn't Anti de Sitter space taken seriously as a model of reality? – physics.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment