Shouldn't it be "HAVE been put on hold" instead of "HAD been put on hold"? – ell.stackexchange.com 12:17 Posted by Unknown No Comments I'm studying TOEIC through a book published by ETS. As always, I was reading scripts and got stuck in one script. The repair of the 300-year-old building began nearly a decade ago but had been put ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitHow to typeset a double subscript (sic!) not a subsubscript correctly – tex.stackexchange.comWho invented the "talking Patronus" spell used by the Order in the second Wizarding War? – scifi.stackexchange.comWhat does "Relativistic" mean in Quantum Mechanical Terms? – physics.stackexchange.comComplimented on my clothes, What is the recommended time before wearing them again? – workplace.stackexchange.comHighlight max absolute value in a row of data – superuser.comWhat could be the cause of a disease that makes someone or something fall towards the sky? – worldbuilding.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Shouldn't it be "HAVE been put on hold" instead of "HAD been put on hold"? – ell.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment