Is "acediast" too archaic to be parsed in literature? – english.stackexchange.com

Is "acediast" too archaic to be parsed in literature? – english.stackexchange.com

18:03 No Comments
I'm editing a manuscript where the word "acediast" appears a perfect fit, but Merriam-Webster is the only online dictionary I can find that lists it as a word, with the exception of a few scrabble ...

from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow
via Blogspot

Share this

Unknown

Artikel Terkait

0 Comment to "Is "acediast" too archaic to be parsed in literature? – english.stackexchange.com"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)