Why are spells considered an attack for shield spell but not extra attack? – rpg.stackexchange.com 12:03 Posted by Unknown No Comments Sifting through the threads I can't make heads or tails of it. From my understanding the shield spell can somehow trigger from a spell that uses an attack roll (the spell being considered an "attack" ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitHow does Find Familiar work with a Ring of Spell Storing? – rpg.stackexchange.comWhat medical costs burden the military enough to warrant banning all transgender people? – politics.stackexchange.comDo players resolve each attack first before moving onto additional attacks within an action? – rpg.stackexchange.comWhat's the difference between "and" and "&"? – movies.stackexchange.comWhy does Davos go with Jon? – scifi.stackexchange.comWhat does 'a hairline crack where the grip meets the graphite shaft on my 3-wood ' mean in this English joke? – ell.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Why are spells considered an attack for shield spell but not extra attack? – rpg.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment