Counterexample showing that G-invariant de Rham cohomology different from cohomology of G-invariant sub-complex? – mathoverflow.net 10:53 Posted by Unknown No Comments If $G$ is a discrete or a Lie Group acting smoothly on a manifold $M$, we can define the algebra of $G$-invariant de Rham classes, $H(M)^G$, and we can also consider the cohomology of the sub-complex ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitAmplification before tubes and transistors were invented – electronics.stackexchange.comWhat does "cost per bit" mean? – superuser.comStoring Electronic Components Outside – electronics.stackexchange.comWhat happens with methods' tests when that method become private after re-design in TDD? – softwareengineering.stackexchange.comWarlock Pact weapon on Sentient or Artifact Magic weapon – rpg.stackexchange.comSalesforce password policy – salesforce.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Counterexample showing that G-invariant de Rham cohomology different from cohomology of G-invariant sub-complex? – mathoverflow.net"
Post a Comment