Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are beneficial? – academia.stackexchange.com

Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are beneficial? – academia.stackexchange.com

05:52 No Comments
Every so often, I stumble upon a question concerning "double blind peer review", i.e., the authors don't know the reviewers (as usual) but also the reviewers don't know the identity of the authors. ...

from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow
via Blogspot

Share this

Unknown

Artikel Terkait

0 Comment to "Is there any evidence that double blind peer review systems are beneficial? – academia.stackexchange.com"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)