Why does the unique_ptr have no overhead? – stackoverflow.com 06:21 Posted by Unknown No Comments First take a look at what C++ Primer said about unique_ptr and shared_ptr: $16.1.6. Efficiency and Flexibility We can be certain that shared_ptr does not hold the deleter as a direct member, ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitIs there a mathematical explanation for this dice packing phenomenon? – mathoverflow.netSolve a limit without l'Hôpital – math.stackexchange.comFind the riddle or its solution – puzzling.stackexchange.comExtracting data from analog screen photograph – mathematica.stackexchange.comWill my device work with Ubuntu? – askubuntu.comDraw box for text – tex.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Why does the unique_ptr have no overhead? – stackoverflow.com"
Post a Comment