Are classes still "larger" than sets without the axiom of choice? – mathoverflow.net 00:07 Posted by Unknown No Comments Classes are often informally thought of as being "larger" than sets. Usually, the notion of "larger" is formalized via an injection: $B$ is "at least as large" as $A$ iff there is an injection from ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitCast shield while carrying a sword and shield? – rpg.stackexchange.comIntuition behind proving that f is constant – math.stackexchange.comAre categories of fibrant objects idempotent complete? – mathoverflow.netMy intended position means a colleague's job disappears, should I give him a heads-up? – workplace.stackexchange.comHow Are the Solutions for Finite Sums of Natural Numbers Derived? – math.stackexchange.comFind R such that the man covers shortest distance. – math.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Are classes still "larger" than sets without the axiom of choice? – mathoverflow.net"
Post a Comment