Has the C++17 extension to aggregate initialization made brace initialization dangerous? – stackoverflow.com 07:11 Posted by Unknown No Comments There seems to be a general consensus that brace initialization should be preferred over other forms of initialization, however since the introduction of the C++17 extension to aggregate ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel Terkaitwhat happens when you reach your data storage limit in an org? – salesforce.stackexchange.comMathematics Stack Exchange as an indicator for academic career – academia.stackexchange.comBash: pressing escape 4 times – unix.stackexchange.comIf C++ is generally faster than java, why most data analysis / ETL tools are developed in java? – softwareengineering.stackexchange.comWhy are gluons believed to be massless? – physics.stackexchange.comIs there a bijection between the reals and naturals? – math.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Has the C++17 extension to aggregate initialization made brace initialization dangerous? – stackoverflow.com"
Post a Comment