Why didn't the Concorde have flaps or slats? – aviation.stackexchange.com 16:34 Posted by Unknown No Comments It's well known that the Concorde had no flaps or slats. The lack of high-lift devices considerably reduced lift at low speeds, requiring the Concorde to take off and land at higher speeds and angles ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitIs there a mathematical description of three-part ratios? – math.stackexchange.comWhy is this call ambiguous if they have different parameters? – stackoverflow.comWhat we do about puzzles when we say puzzles? We raise them, cast them, ... or we simply say them? – english.stackexchange.comDamage Output of Improved Critical vs. Weapon Specialization – rpg.stackexchange.comWhat makes the Free Cities "free"? – scifi.stackexchange.comExcel - user input but retain formula for two circular cells – superuser.com
0 Comment to "Why didn't the Concorde have flaps or slats? – aviation.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment