Why doesn't Godel's Second Incompleteness Theorem rule out a formalizable proof of P!=NP? – cs.stackexchange.com 08:47 Posted by Unknown No Comments I'm sure there must be something wrong with the following reasoning because otherwise a lot of P vs. NP research would be curtailed but I cannot determine my error: For any fixed integer $k>0$ ... from Hot Questions - Stack Exchange OnStackOverflow via Blogspot Share this Google Facebook Twitter More Digg Linkedin Stumbleupon Delicious Tumblr BufferApp Pocket Evernote Unknown Artikel TerkaitIsolate the Window Glass and Foil of your house – codegolf.stackexchange.comAltium schematic editor colours – electronics.stackexchange.comHow to trigger explosive arrows? – worldbuilding.stackexchange.comIs there any economical way to move the water from the Martian poles to the people? – space.stackexchange.comPositive definite matrix is always symmetric? – math.stackexchange.comHow to discuss bad communication? – interpersonal.stackexchange.com
0 Comment to "Why doesn't Godel's Second Incompleteness Theorem rule out a formalizable proof of P!=NP? – cs.stackexchange.com"
Post a Comment